Hi Jecel,

> On Tuesday 10 February 2004 18:25, smallsqueak.net wrote:
> >     Is Resilient(TM) Smalltalk ?
> 
> It certainly is, but in the same style as Pocket Smalltalk 
> (http://www.pocketsmalltalk.com/) or Fly 
> (http://portal.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=949418&dl=ACM&coll=portal) where 
> the development image is separate from the execution image.
> 
> Little Smalltalk is an often forgotten reduced implementation 
> (http://www.smalltalk.org/versions/LittleSmalltalk.html) which is 
> almost self contained. You need an external editor or web browser.
> 

    I tried a version on your site some time ago but the image 
    could not be loaded on Win32 platform.

    Do you happen to have a pair of image+vm for Win32 that is
    working on one of your obsolete your machines ;-)

> Squat can work either way - with a remote development image or it can 
> grow (eventually) into a complete Squeak.
> 
    Yeah, Squattology is actually very hot ,  let's hope the temperature 
    does not go beyond the boiling point ;-)

> My own Neo Smalltalk project is also focused right now on a tiny but 
> self contained system. My benchmark for "tiny" is Chuck Moore's 
> ColorForth (http://www.colorforth.com).
> 

    Is it available somewhere (I mean Neo Smalltalk ;-)

> Since Resilient includes things like TCP/IP stack that the others don't 
> but is missing the reflective and development tools, it is hard to 
> directly compare their sizes.
> 
    
    How hard would it be to add reflection to Resilient ?

    Cheers,

    SmallSqueak