Zurgle as default Squeak visual interface? NO, if...

ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Feb 12 12:03:00 UTC 2004


On 12 févr. 04, at 12:22, Torsten Sadowski wrote:

> that means Squeak is carrying another beautiful but otherwise useless
> megabyte. It's nice to have it if you need it but who would like a 
> linux
> where you would be forced to use KDE(3).
>
> The idea of making Zurgle "default" runs against a lean modularized
> Squeak.
>
> Torsten

No this is just how you introduce Zurgle, if we just have a package 
that is
added to Squeak Full then this will be working. Imagine Squat with
a default distribution that include Zurgle with some cool look.

The out of the box effect is important. 



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list