Binaries in Monticello

Julian Fitzell julian at beta4.com
Fri Feb 13 17:45:51 UTC 2004


Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> Am 13.02.2004 um 14:31 schrieb ducasse:
> 
>>>
>>>> Avi for me the next step is:
>>>>     - can we have a binary format for Monticello, alex coded for the 
>>>> modules of Henrik a binary format.
>>>> We were thinking to release it (I'm not sure that this is good).
>>>
>>>
>>> I'd definitely like to see that.  It's a binary format as in saving 
>>> and loading bytecode instead of source?
>>
>>
>> Alex is in rush for a paper (19 march deadline) but I passed him the 
>> message.
>> Basically you save bytecode in addition to source. It works well for 
>> alex as classboxes do not rely
>> on a centralized source manager. So I imagine that more development is 
>> needed there if we would like
>> to use that for Squeak. But this can be a good basis to start with a 
>> lot of tests (if I remember correctly)
> 
> 
> I'd like a way to check binary files from disk into a MC repository 
> (similar to CVS). Alternatively, or perhaps additionally, a way to store 
> an image segment with the code.

We talked about being able to do that early in the MC development cycle 
and I'm pretty sure it should still be doable.  Andrew and I have a need 
for this at work so we'll probably do it eventually if nobody else does, 
but it won't be until the end of march, I'd guess...

Julian





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list