[ENH] Use of EndOfStream (sm)

ducasse ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Feb 17 08:57:37 UTC 2004


Hi bill

Sorry so then what do you suggest?  Is this a bug in boris changes?


Stef confused by lack of information...

On 17 févr. 04, at 03:46, Bill Schwab wrote:

> Hello all,
>
> On 29 Dec, Boris posted a change set to attempt to make Squeak signal 
> EndOfStream when the corresponding condition occurs.  I just tried it 
> in 3.7a and noted that EndOfStream>>defaultAction took the teeth out 
> of it.  Reverting to Error>>defaultAction gets #next to signal an 
> error, but #next: is still willing to truncate w/o complaining 
> (something that I would leave to #nextAvailable:).




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list