Doug Way  wrote:

>On Sunday, February 15, 2004, at 06:38 PM, Marcus Denker wrote:
>
>>
>>What do we do with these SqueakMap entries? Remove them? Somehow 
>>retire them, so they
>>are available for 3.6 but not for 3.7?
>
>At the very least, 3.7-compatibility should be removed for those 
>packages.  Perhaps Goran or some other SM admin could do this?
>
>It would be nice if there were some good way to indicate that these 
>packages are already incorporated in the basic image.  (Retire them, 
>as you say.)  I suppose a comment could be tacked on to the 
>description of each one.  Deleting them altogether is probably too 
>extreme... a 3.6 user might want to be able to use them.
>
>- Doug

Can't  packages already be marked that way (at least textually)? It 
would be nice to see packages like that disappear when the 'display 
new or newer packages '  is set. I don't think it is.