> >>> "Avi Bryant" 01/25/04 21:13 >>>
> 
> I've just posted two new releases of Monticello to SM, revisions #86 
> and #90.  Why two?  Because one of the bugs fixed in release 86 is 
> triggered by release 90 - so if you're upgrading from an earlier 
> version, you have to upgrade to 86 *first* (fixing the bug), and then 
> upgrade to 90 (no longer triggering it).  If you try to upgrade 
> directly from, eg, 69 to 90, you'll get an error halfway through the 
> load and your image will be left in a horrible inconsistent state.  
> Don't do this.  (Isn't self-hosting fun?)  Just loading 90 
> into a clean 
> image should be fine, though.

I downloaded version 86 from SqueakMap, installed it manually, and then
upgraded using the PackageLoader. Everything worked fine until right at
the very end, where I got a Warning. The Warning said "blah blah you
can click on Proceed to try again, which will probably work". Certainly
I didn't get any errors after that.

I presume that this is normal and fine and I haven't just destroyed my
image, leaving it a smoking ruin of radioactive rubble? Certainly,
opening a MonticelloBrowser I can open SnapShotBrowsers on packages and
look at bits, without things blowing up, so I think I'm in the clear...

frank