On Monday 12 July 2004 8:24 am, Michael Rueger wrote:
> Doug Way wrote:
> > Lately, I've been waiting for Goran's latest SM2 packages to include as
> > updates (which load from SM).  We decided that these have only minor new
> > functionality and deserve to be in 3.7.  The new SM2 versions are out
> > there and it looks pretty good so far, but I will wait for the upcoming
> > 1.01 bugfix release.
> >
>  >On Sunday, July 11, 2004, at 05:29 PM, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> >
> > PS. I think it is about time Monticello became an "Official package in
> > Basic". One good reason is that anyone who upgrades to the new SM2
> > releases I just made - and I assume everyone does eventually - will be
> > asked to install it anyway. Doug? Time to make that little update.  :)
>
> This would mean that in *gamma* both a new package loader and Monticello
> would come into the image???

I agree. I thought we were trying to stick to FIXes in the gamma stream.

I wouldn't call loading Monticello as "only minor new functionality". Why, by 
the way, does the new SM2 version require Monticello? The MCZInstaller does 
OK for most SM package loading.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/