On Monday 12 July 2004 12:27 pm, Avi Bryant wrote:
> On Jul 12, 2004, at 11:08 AM, Ned Konz wrote:
> >  Why, by the way, does the new SM2 version require Monticello? The
> > MCZInstaller does
> > OK for most SM package loading.
>
> Because people already have the old SM2 version installed.  The
> MczInstaller would load the new version on top of the old, instead of
> doing a clean upgrade.

OK, but for the purposes of the upgrade stream, why not just distribute the 
change set that MC produces when doing that? That way we could do a clean 
upgrade without having to load Monticello to do it.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/