How to improve Squeak

Alexander Lazarević Alexander at Lazarevic.de
Tue Jul 13 10:48:20 UTC 2004


Ned Konz schrieb:

>We have been so conservative with reviewing individual items because there are 
>a number of people (too many, probably) using the pre-release versions of 
>Squeak for everyday work. As a result, we don't want to break too much.
>  
>
I think more people would use the stable version of Squeak for every day 
work if it would receive a little maintenance in form of irregular 
updates. Certainly these should only include bug fixes that (ideally) 
don't have any negative influence on existing code, which was written 
based on the stable version.

>Using a bug tracking system (no, we don't have to write our own!) would give 
>better tracking, threading, assignment of responsibility, etc.
>
We _definitely_ should have such a BTS. Why not just set up bugzilla, 
mantis or whatever to see how we could make it fit in the Squeak 
development process?

Alex



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list