The future of SM...
stéphane ducasse
ducasse at iam.unibe.ch
Thu Jul 15 19:40:33 UTC 2004
Hi goran
Just two points from my perspective:
- SM is a meta-catalog that we will use even if Squat one day delivers
its beauty. In any
case during that period of time (I would love to see Squat
successful) we will have learn a lot
from SM and may be SM will just suck in Squat modules as it is doing
for MC (even if I prefer MC
than changeset :)).
We need SM and we need it much better (thanks for your effort). SM is
a core of energy
for the community. I can go there and see what other have been doing.
This really really important. As soon as we will have bundles
(dependencies between packages) then SM will be really really cool.
- Squat is exciting in the sense that we could have a mini-core on
which "modules" (I do not like
the term because there is no scoping mechanism in the module of squat
as far as I understood)
can be loaded. Now may be in a point in the future we will have to
think about the
interaction between the two. But keep going both :).
Stef
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|