Hi all!

"Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
> Hi Doug,
> 
> I think it is worthwhile for a number of ongoing projects to consider a very
> short 3.8 cycle which basically pulls in the m17n stuff and no more. The
> reason being that various projects do need a stable point of departure which
> *does* include m17n and the changes are major enough that they will most
> definitely need some time to shake down. I think we would be better off if
> we basically go to beta straight away and maybe have another release two
> months down the road than putting in (and waiting for!) "new stuff" and have
> the next release only 6-8 month from now.
> 
> Cheers,
>   - Andreas

Well, if the other Guides think this sounds reasonable - and the VM port
maintainers, then why not. We could instead focus on changing the
development process during these months.

regards, Göran