=?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> May be you scared a bit people with the scheme that you had in mind.
> May be having a simple and incremental (on problems) approach could 
> work. So we could get simple
> but not scalable dependencies then later on cool debian like 
> dependencies.


I think Goran's priorities are fine.  We need to process the actual,
running code that we already have, before we worry about writing *more*
code.  Just imagine: someone writes dependencies for SM and then it sits
in the BFAV queue because no one has time to review it....


-Lex