Giovanni Giorgi wrote:

> I know BFAV2 does work on 3.7b but Celeste do not :)
> I have trouble loading Celeste on 3.7b, so I tried to rollback to 3.6 
> image.
> Celeste doesn't load emitting the error "Categorizer cannot be 
> recompiled" and package load abort.
> I must work on Celeste and I'd like to use BFAV2.
> What version of image and packages do you  suggest to work with?
> Thank you !


Well, since you are the new maintainer of Celeste, the course of action 
that I would recommend is to fix the problems with Celeste so that it 
loads in 3.7b. :-)  This is probably more important than any other work 
you might do on Celeste anyway.  If you get stuck on a particular 
problem trying to fix Celeste, you can post the bug report/stack here on 
squeak-dev and ask questions.

You don't really need BFAV in order to do this.

As a general strategy, you could have a 3.6 image w/Celeste running at 
the same time as a 3.7b image in which you try to load Celeste, and 
compare between the two images to see what is different.

- Doug


>
> Ned Konz ha scritto in data 07/06/2004 22.38:
>
>> [...]
>>
>>> I have tried to download ANSI Compatibility and some other
>>> collection-related packages without much success...
>>> What must I do to got BFAV up and running?!
>>> Thank you!
>>>   
>>
>>
>> That's a method that was in the Refactoring Browser and later was put 
>> in update 5597. However, you don't have that update in a 3.6 image.
>>
>> I think that most of the people using BFAV are doing so with 3.7b 
>> images.
>>
>> The BFAV2 package itself is marked as being for 3.7b, not for 3.6.
>>
>>  
>>
>
>