Tim Rowledge wrote:

> Perhaps this should be expanded so that uncommented methods (perhaps
> testing for more than a smallish number of bytecodes?) also have such a
> comment automagically added? Since we have the writers initials
> (normally) we could even make it be something like
>
> "That idiot tpr has not bothered to comment this method. What a loser"

In that case I would modify my standard method template to have this default 
comment:

"Any idiot should be able to understand how this method works."

It's a whole sentence, it begins with a capital and it has a period at the 
end. What more do you want?

Cheers, Lothar