[BUG][FIX] TestRunner UI interaction
Marcus Denker
marcus at ira.uka.de
Wed Mar 3 19:28:52 UTC 2004
Am 03.03.2004 um 20:24 schrieb goran.krampe at bluefish.se:
> "Andreas Raab" <andreas.raab at gmx.de> wrote:
>> Thanks Marcus. This did the trick. I wonder how anyone is supposed to
>> know
>> that though ... there is something fundamentally wrong here with the
>> process. If SUnit is an official package there shouldn't be a need to
>> review
>> that "upgrade CS" - or even more specifically, there shouldn't even
>> be a
>> need to post that CS. If I say "update my system" isn't that an
>> obvious
>> indication that this includes all of the packages I'm carrying around
>> with
>> it?!
>
> The reason was I presume that SUnit was in the image - but not as an SM
> package.
> Now with Marcus update - it is installed as a package, and thus will be
> independently upgradeable.
>
Shouldn't a "update code from server" then do both a update wrt. to
the update
stream and tell SM to install all updated packages?
Marcus
--
Marcus Denker marcus at ira.uka.de
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|