Back to the issue... (was RE: Squeak coding style...)
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
goran.krampe at bluefish.se
Thu Mar 4 09:09:34 UTC 2004
Trygve Reenskaug <trygver at ifi.uio.no> wrote:
> Goran,
> Hey, you got a point here. Perhaps we could try to introduce a few standard
> conventions in our *standard packages*."?! And then we can take the
> discussion from there!
>
> We need to get innovations out quickly, even if they are dirty. (I really
> need the stuff I'm using right now. It would have been nice if it had been
> more complete. But this is much better than not having it at all.
>
> But a package shouldn't be upgraded to a *standard package* before it
> fulfills a few quality requirements - and that includes a minimum of
> comments and/or documentation.
Thank you, thank you, thank you. :) At least I am not alone.
regards, Göran
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|