[Q] initialization pattern
Boris.Gaertner at gmx.net
Sun May 16 16:36:21 UTC 2004
"stéphane ducasse" <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
On 16 mai 04, at 17:36, Boris Gaertner wrote:
>> With change set 5503 a new initialization pattern
>> was introduced: The method Behavior>> new
>> sends the message initialize to the newly created
>> instance. This has some advantages (also, but not only,
>> for teaching) and will hardly ever cause problems.
>> Interestingly, the object creation pattern for
>> variable subclasses was left unchanged: The
>> method Behavíor>>new: does not send the message
>> initialize to the newly created object.
>Seems to me a mistake because new: should call also initialize or may
That is quite possible, I found that on 2003-09-09
you posted a change set that contained (among
other things) this definition:
Behavior methodsFor: 'instance creation'
"Answer an initialized instance of this class with the number of indexable
variables specified by the argument, sizeRequested."
^ (self basicNew: sizeRequested) initialize
I still could not find out why this got lost. I will try to
find out but perhaps a KCP fellow has a quick
More information about the Squeak-dev