3.7 Full: Developers or Media users?
avi at beta4.com
Mon May 24 19:11:18 UTC 2004
On May 24, 2004, at 1:58 AM, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> And another thing - we have been talking about having Monticello
> included in Basic. I think that would be good.
> Monticello is a major important piece of the whole "packages" thing, we
> have discussed it earlier too.
As I say, it's fine with me. Last time this came up there was a
concern that we not make other key parts of the image dependent on
Monticello, which I completely agree with - the Browser, for example,
should be version-control agnostic. Given that, hopefully it's ok with
Maybe we can tentatively plan to include in in 3.8a, and see if anyone
More information about the Squeak-dev