3.7 Full: Developers or Media users?

Avi Bryant avi at beta4.com
Mon May 24 19:11:18 UTC 2004

On May 24, 2004, at 1:58 AM, goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:

> And another thing - we have been talking about having Monticello
> included in Basic. I think that would be good.
> Monticello is a major important piece of the whole "packages" thing, we
> have discussed it earlier too.
> Avi?

As I say, it's fine with me.  Last time this came up there was a 
concern that we not make other key parts of the image dependent on 
Monticello, which I completely agree with - the Browser, for example, 
should be version-control agnostic.  Given that, hopefully it's ok with 

Maybe we can tentatively plan to include in in 3.8a, and see if anyone 


More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list