> Yes, I am the one to blame. That's the problem with this harvesting: 
> You can easily
> make a complete fool of yourself...
>
> Just send a chageset to remove them again. (or add it direktly to the 
> update stream)
>
> But generally: We have tried (for months) to find knowledgabe people 
> who would be
> responsible for certain parts of the image (e.g. networking, eToys, 
> Morphic) who look at the
> changes that are submitted.
>
> Nobody has stepped forward to do that...
>
>        Marcus
>

Exactly!
And this is the problem. May be we could have a test that check that 
old class should not reappear :)

Stef