About Smalltalk at: .... ifAbsent:/present:
Colin Putney
cputney at wiresong.ca
Tue Nov 30 13:50:38 UTC 2004
Andreas Raab wrote:
> I like it but it's ambigious too if for any reason the value of Foo
> understands the message. The point is that the #ifPresent: message
> really is meta in the sense that it ought to be sent to the variable Foo
> instead of the value Foo.
Aren't you the one who keeps saying that Smalltalk doesn't have
variables, just names that refer to objects? :-)
Given the limitation that we can't send a message to the variable (the
binding, I guess) without changing the language, I still think this is a
reasonable solution:
* it provides a consistent idiom for expressing a weak dependency
* the default implementation can handle the class-loaded-or-absent case
* other objects can override it to manage their own "presence."
That seems consistent with the way other parts of Smalltalk work, and
it's a distinct improvement over the ad-hoc stuff we've all been doing.
Colin
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|