Yes so may be we need real package and mark cs or class definition with 
them

Stef

On 1 oct. 04, at 08:05, Marcus Denker wrote:

>
> Am 30.09.2004 um 21:20 schrieb Magistrello Alejandro (SFA):
>
>> Stef,
>>
>> the SarBuilder is not part of the image, is an outside package, the 
>> fix works, but don't need to be an update
>>
>
> These in-image packages are a real pain: There is no support in the 
> tools to know what part of the system
> you are not supposed to change, no support to break a change up into 
> pieces. As the system is now, adding
> more "in image" packages would lead to a real problem soon.
>
>     Marcus
>
>