danielv at tx.technion.ac.il wrote:

> Yes, yes, Stef was far too ambivalent. We need to *decide* what system
> is used for what.
> 
> So if anyone thinks the policy should be different from the below, argue
> for it.
> 
> AFAIK, nobody has currently said that he is harvesting bug *fixes* from
> mantis, which implies that bugfixes and enh are posted to and handled by
> the BFAV, since that's what the harvesters currently use. 
> 
> We don't really do bug tracking on the BFAV, and Mantis might be
> actually useful for that, so post *bugs* to Mantis.

Could someone make up a list of what BFAV needs to be used
as a bug tracker?
Maybe it's not that hard to add those features.
As a start I have added a bug tab, it's in the development version at
SqueakSource. 
Karl