OK, so I'll work on the IndexedCollection strictly until the update of
the indices are needed. 
So if I need it, I'll ask you for clues !

Thank you,

Sebastián Sastre
 
ssastre at seaswork.com.ar 
Seaswork 
Special Software Solutions
www.seaswork.com.ar


-----Mensaje original-----
De: squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org
[mailto:squeak-dev-bounces at lists.squeakfoundation.org] En nombre de Avi
Bryant
Enviado el: Miércoles, 06 de Octubre de 2004 20:52
Para: The general-purpose Squeak developers list
Asunto: Re: Relative independence of odbs: IndexedCollection,the update
problem



On Oct 6, 2004, at 10:33 PM, Sebastián Sastre wrote:

> 	in one hand, that I don't see a #removeKey: in the TSTree. It
can 
> have it?

Yup.  Just haven't needed it yet, so haven't implemented it.

> 	in the other hand, what about the Btree that can search it's
keys 
> with wilcards (like #matchesForPrefix: for TSTree)?

Yeah, I haven't gotten around to that either.  Though for a BTree I'd 
expect a range search rather than wildcards...

Either of those things should be reasonably easy for someone else to 
implement if they wanted them (I don't think my code's *that* 
illegible).  I doubt I'll get to either one any time very soon, since 
the current functionality seems to be working for what I need - so if 
you want it, best would be to add it yourself.  If the details of the 
existing code are confusing, give me a shout.

Cheers,
Avi


---
Incoming mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 01/10/2004
 

---
Outgoing mail is certified Virus Free.
Checked by AVG anti-virus system (http://www.grisoft.com).
Version: 6.0.772 / Virus Database: 519 - Release Date: 01/10/2004