On Oct 10, 2004, at 4:30 PM, danielv at tx.technion.ac.il wrote:

> Ok, did a first shot at it.
> Some background on proposals to Squeak development:
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3864
>
> UnstableSqueak main page:
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3865
>
> which links to another page about more benefits of using MC instead of
> the update stream.

Thanks.

>  I'd propose the following:
>
> The first release of Unstable Squeak should focus on extendibility - it
> should include some of those extension mechanisms (like Services)
> floating around. It should make it possible for various packages that
> currently override stuff in Squeak to get integrated stop doing so.
>
> Does this make sense?

Since you're right that nobody seems to be committing without such a 
goal - sure, sounds good.  Let's get OmniBrowser in there too, and John 
Pierce's #inform:/confirm:/request: automation.

Avi