"just hobby-squeakers" (was "Proposal for Squeak 3.8")
Marcus Denker
denker at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Oct 12 09:57:48 UTC 2004
Am 11.10.2004 um 02:26 schrieb Craig Latta:
>
> (Oops, sorry, I meant to make a new thread the first time.)
>
> Hi Marcus--
>
>> If you look at the structure now, we see that there are some Guides,
>> not doing that much actually, because they are (mostly) just
>> hobby-squeakers.
>
> Ha! I have to disagree with you there, on both counts. First,
> I'm doing a lot of work making a minimal system. For over a year I've
> asked for discussion and reported progress, and I've made some
> releases.
> While there have been some significant individual exceptions (see, for
> example, the Squat acknowledgements) the general response to all of
> these things has been, er, minimal. :) From my point of view, it seems
> like people are just sitting back waiting for a finished result. That's
> still tenable; the part that concerns me is the lack of discussion
> about
> desired features and integration timing. I guess the consensus is that
> it's not worth discussing until there is a finished result (which may
> or
> not do what people want :).
>
> Second, I don't think it's at all clear that paid Squeakers
> contribute more or less than unpaid ones (in any dimension: time,
> energy, code quality, etc.), and the very question is pointless.
> Belittling either group is unconstructive; please don't go there. :)
Sorry for that... I retract all that.
But: We have severe problems wrt. communication. I would like to see
that fixed.
(Maybe I should put a bug report in mantis for that?)
Another thing that you should really keep in mind: How can this
community adopt
Squat at all if there is no culture of making it possible that even
simple stuff gets
added or fixed?
Marcus
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|