Smalltalk = strongly typed?
Ned Konz
ned at squeakland.org
Thu Oct 14 14:20:17 UTC 2004
On Thursday 14 October 2004 4:15 am, Blake wrote:
> I see the evolution of languages and environments needing to move
> toward respect for the distinctions between design-time and compile-time
> and interface interaction. I'm not sure the Smalltalk approach of "it's all
> design time--or run-time, whatever"<s> is optimal.
There have been a number of environments that added some amounts of (optional)
type declaration and static checking to what were otherwise entirely
dynamically-typed languages.
Look at Strongtalk, for instance.
http://www.cs.ucsb.edu/projects/strongtalk/pages/index.html
--
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|