Update stream -> MC (was: Re: About a working group on CS->MC)

danielv at tx.technion.ac.il danielv at tx.technion.ac.il
Fri Oct 22 07:58:20 UTC 2004


Ok, if you can help us define the first release by naming some extension
mechanisms you think are ready for inclusion, that'd be great.  You can
add them to the Inclusion List at
http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3865

Daniel

=?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> ok I will try to find some time. Now I'm back in big VW hacking (MOF, 
> XMI, XSD) so
> squeak is not in the immediate radar :)
> 
> Stef
> 
> On 19 oct. 04, at 23:37, danielv at techunix.technion.ac.il wrote:
> 
> > Sure. Get UnstableSqueak, insert into it some changes that are
> > reasonably safe and fit the goal (I know you look into exactly this 
> > kind
> > of stuff), and commit it in. Work with it, give feedback.
> >
> > Daniel
> >
> > =?ISO-8859-1?Q?st=E9phane_ducasse?= <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> >> I think that this experiment is really important!!!
> >> How can I help?
> >> Do you need more packages?
> >>
> >> Stef
> >>
> >> On 10 oct. 04, at 17:44, Avi Bryant wrote:
> >>
> >>>
> >>> On Oct 10, 2004, at 4:30 PM, danielv at tx.technion.ac.il wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Ok, did a first shot at it.
> >>>> Some background on proposals to Squeak development:
> >>>> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3864
> >>>>
> >>>> UnstableSqueak main page:
> >>>> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/3865
> >>>>
> >>>> which links to another page about more benefits of using MC instead 
> >>>> of
> >>>> the update stream.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks.
> >>>
> >>>>  I'd propose the following:
> >>>>
> >>>> The first release of Unstable Squeak should focus on extendibility -
> >>>> it
> >>>> should include some of those extension mechanisms (like Services)
> >>>> floating around. It should make it possible for various packages 
> >>>> that
> >>>> currently override stuff in Squeak to get integrated stop doing so.
> >>>>
> >>>> Does this make sense?
> >>>
> >>> Since you're right that nobody seems to be committing without such a
> >>> goal - sure, sounds good.  Let's get OmniBrowser in there too, and
> >>> John Pierce's #inform:/confirm:/request: automation.
> >>>
> >>> Avi
> >>>
> >>>
> >



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list