Hmm.

A little rethinking makes me think that I may have misread this comment.

Perhaps you mean the results of the survey are processed by Squeak if
not gathered by Squeak?  If so then I apologize from my previous strong
statement.

Ken Causey

On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 15:11, Ken Causey wrote:
> On Thu, 2004-09-09 at 14:33, Jeff Eastman wrote:
> >  Would it help to know that the software that is processing my survey
> > is written in Squeak?
> 
> The way this is written I believe we are expected to take this as fact. 
> However it's quite obvious that this is completely FALSE.  This is
> easily detectable from the URLs:
> 
> http://www.windwardsolutions.com/smalltalksurvey.htm
> 
> http://www.windwardsolutions.com/_vti_bin/shtml.exe/smalltalksurvey.htm
> 
> I'm sorry now that I even filled out your survey since false statements
> of this sort don't give me a good feeling about your integrity.
> 
> Ken Causey
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
Url : http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20040909/cf0584fc/attachment.pgp