[BUG][FIX] BFAVAttachmentFix

karl.ramberg at chello.se karl.ramberg at chello.se
Tue Sep 21 19:35:27 UTC 2004


"Frank Shearar" <Frank.Shearar at rnid.org.uk> wrote:
> Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2004 17:18:58 +0100
> From: "Frank Shearar" <Frank.Shearar at rnid.org.uk>
> Subject: RE: [BUG][FIX] BFAVAttachmentFix
> To: "The general-purpose Squeak developers list"  <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> reply-to: The general-purpose Squeak developers list <squeak-dev at lists.squeakfoundation.org>
> 
> Karl Ramberg <karl.ramberg at chello.se> wrote:
> 
> > "Frank Shearar" <Frank.Shearar at rnid.org.uk> wrote:
> > 
> > > Karl Ramberg <karl.ramberg at chello.se>
> > > > 
> > > > "Change Set:		BFAVAttachmentFix
> > > > Date:			21 September 2004
> > > > Author:			Karl Ramberg
> > > > 
> > > > Hopefully a fix for BFAV when m17n is loaded."
> > > > 
> > > Great stuff!
> > > 
> > > I think you mentioned this before, but do you have an ID 
> > number for a BFAV post that illustrates the problem?
> > > 
> > This fixes issues with gzipped attachments.
> > The method in question had a quite complex way of writing 
> > out streams, I'm not sure why it was that complex...
> > Anyway, use of streams changes with m17n and this hopefully 
> > resolves the issues :-)
> > Karl
> 
> Yes, I realise that. If I had a BFAV post affected by the bug though I could try out BFAV on that post, rather than just reading the code. And then maybe we can write a test to make sure we don't see this bug again. (This might require me to write a mock repository, a task I've tried to put off.)
> 
Just pick any one in the archive like 24376. 
Karl



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list