On Tuesday 05 April 2005 5:57 am, thimof at iutc3.unicaen.fr wrote:
> Yes, thank you, this is precisely the document I ised

You might also look at my notes on writing plugins:

http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/writingPlugins.html

> but I also had sample 
> code (I thought they came together but I now think I was wrong). This
> latter example code has a mistake (at least I think it has) : it pops 5
> arguments in a function that took no parameter, and despite this it seems
> to be working fine.

Where did you find this code?

> This's what misleaded me. Does the interpreter proxy 
> handle such errors and only pop what actually belongs to the function??
> (I'm almost sure the answer is 'no').

No.

-- 
Ned Konz
http://bike-nomad.com/squeak/