David,

It seems you have some experience with GOODS. Can you shed some 
information regarding your experience with it, primarily in terms of 
performance. All the tests I've run so far indicate to me that 
performance of GOODS leaves a lot to be desired. However, because of 
architectural reasons, I find GOODS to be a valuable OODB.

Thanks,
Daniel

On Apr 12, 2005, at 6:43 PM, David Shaffer wrote:

> As soon as performance laggs ;-)  Personally I use BTree's and 
> TreeSet's
> w/ GOODS in many places.  Generally any collection that grows over a
> couple hundred elements.  They have a huge impact on things like "user
> lists" which are searched quite often.  Using a Dictionary for
> persistence hasn't worked well for me in these cases.
>
> David