Brad Fuller wrote:
> Stéphane Rollandin wrote:
> 
>> hello,
>>
>> now that we have OSC support, does someone plan to work on a Squeak 
>> client for the Supercollider server ?
>>
>>
>> Stef
> 
> 
> How do you see Squeak interfacing with SC or PD in practice? Why not 
> just use SC or PD for your compositions? Are you thinking of interfacing 
> non-audio Squeak apps with SC?
> 
> brad
> 

I don't see the same picture with PD and SC. PD patches define their own 
semantic for OSC messages so there are as many clients as there are 
patches, while I believe there is a definite OSC adress tree within the 
SC server which provide hooks for writing the client langage the 
composer actually program with.

at the moment I am aware of the existence of the original SClang client 
langage (for MacOS and Linux I reckon), a PLT Scheme implementation and 
a Python one (which is part of the Windows port of SC).

the original SC3 client/server relationship is explained here:
http://www.psi-o.net/pseudonym/boot_up.php (SClang /

the PLT scheme extension is introduced here:
http://www.alphalink.com.au/~rd/p/rsc.html

so what I had in mind was something along the line of the PLT Scheme 
stuff, only within Squeak.

to say it another way: the SC sound engine does not require a specific 
langage to be programmed. so why not using smalltalk ?


Stef