[Q] Speed comparison 2.8 vs 3.8

Martin Wirblat sql.mawi at t-link.de
Fri Aug 26 20:54:43 UTC 2005


Juan Vuletich wrote:
.....
> The mid-term objective of MorphicSplitters is to be able to unload Etoys 
> from a standard image and have a smaller Morphic that works properly. 
> The long term objective is to remove Etoys and other optional packages 
> that use Morphic from the image, and have them in SqueakMap. And when 
> all Etoys users switch to Tweak, just leave Etoys behind.
> 

And when all Morphic users switch to Tweak or wxSqueak, just leave 
Morphic behind. Or is there any specific reason to stay with Morphic?

To put it differently, why do you seem to think only Etoys users will 
switch to Tweak, or why should one who wants a 'morphic' UI not switch 
to Tweak?

regards,
Martin



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list