[Q] Speed comparison 2.8 vs 3.8
Marcus Denker
denker at iam.unibe.ch
Sat Aug 27 08:44:19 UTC 2005
Am 27.08.2005 um 10:05 schrieb stéphane ducasse:
> Hi andreas
>
> Thanks for proposing your help.
>
> at esug with ported all the packages to 3.9alpha, checking all the
> conflicts. There was nothing serious.
> Now apparently this is just an order in the configuration files
> that messed up something. I do not know exactly what since
> marcus did it. So for now it does not seem a big problem just a
> pure lack of time... (papers, lectures, new job :)).
>
Yes, no problem with ToolBuilder. The alternate syntax cleanup needed
some shuffling of the load-order to load. This now
seems to work, but the resulting update 6681 strangely did not update
three packages, so I want to re-build it and test it
a bit before making it available. And now source.squeakfoundation.org
is down...
> Once the toolbuilder is in 3.9a I guess that we will call for help
> to migrate code to the *Plus (for the unfamiliar widget rewrite
> that use ToolBuilder framework) classes because some of the classes
> wtih Plus have less functionality and we could get rid of
> having double class ie inspector inspectorPlus.
>
The next steps will be:
-> puplish 6681
-> Merge ToolBuilder (just 24 conflicting method for both
changesets, no problem to do)
-> pushlish as 6682
-> Merge LookEnhancemetns
-> pushlish as 6683
After that, the MorphicSplitters team hat the ball to merge in their
work, and I'd like to have
the toolrefactoring in, too.
Marcus
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|