[Maybe Spam] Re: A strange Squeak bug

Frank Shearar Frank.Shearar at rnid.org.uk
Tue Feb 8 10:20:29 UTC 2005


Tim Rowledge <tim at sumeru.stanford.edu> wrote
> 
> Try
> Smalltalk associations select:[:assn | assn class ~= 
> ReadOnlyVariableBinding]
> to see a list of the classes not protected. I find 671 in a 3.8-6527
> image I've done a bit of fiddling in, along with 1128 that are
> protected.

I see in my image that I've a large number of classes in my own packages that aren't protected.

Should we protect all these classes ourselves? Or are new classes automatically protected? How do we protect existing, unprotected classes?

frank


*******************************************************************
This email and any files transmitted with it are confidential
and intended solely for the use of the individual or entity to
whom they are addressed. Any views or opinions expressed
are solely those of the author and do not necessarily represent
RNID policy.
If you are not the intended recipient you are advised that any
use, dissemination, forwarding, printing or copying of this
email is strictly prohibited.
If you have received this email in error please notify the RNID
Helpdesk by telephone on: +44 (0) 207 296 8282.
The Royal National Institute for Deaf People
Registered Office 19*23 Featherstone Street
London EC1Y 8SL No. 454169 (England)
Registered Charity No. 207720
********************************************************************




More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list