Thanks for your comments. I took them into account. 

Alexandre


On Thu, Feb 10, 2005 at 06:10:26PM +0100, Bert Freudenberg wrote:
> 
> Am 10.02.2005 um 17:31 schrieb stéphane ducasse:
> >>eat :)
> >>
> >>Two things I spotted:
> >>
> >>* I'd rather call "super printOn:" in Array if it's neither literal 
> >>nor self-evaluating
> >>* printAsSelfEvaluatingFormOn: would look nicer using do:separatedBy:
> >
> >Indeed shame on us :)
> >But I like that you like it because I think that this is best 
> >compromise we can get to offer
> >self-evaluation when we can.
> >
> >Stef
> >
> >Alex can you fix that and resubmit the changeset
> 
> And while you're at it, there are a some more classes that are 
> self-evaluating: Booleans, UndefinedObject, Associations, Intervals, 
> Colors, RunArrays come to mind, maybe more.
> 
> Also, in Object it should default to
> 
> 	^self isLiteral
> 
> so you could remove it in String, Number etc. (and you wouldn't forget 
> nil, true, etc.).
> 
> In all other places like Rectangle it should be
> 
> 	^self class == Rectangle
> 
> otherwise any subclass that is non-self-evaluating would break this.
> 
> 
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> 

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.