Blake wrote:

> On Tue, 22 Feb 2005 23:25:21 +0100, Martin Kuball 
> <MartinKuball at web.de>  wrote:
>
>> IMHO Squeak already has a lot of things we can use. But they need to
>> be better integrated, polished up a little bit and bundled with some
>> nice interface classes.
>
>
> That's my feeling, too.

Yes, but maybe more than polished. Some things just don't work.. or they 
work on some platforms and not on others. Or, they are not clean objects 
to build on.

At the very least, it'd be great to get these 
fixed/polished/bundled/interfaced/documented to use. That would open up 
for more enhancements by others.  I'd like to make Squeak more 
attractive to other audio/video developers, too.

brad