[Q] Why is the correct way to as for a Symbol un 3.8 ?
Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene
edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar
Thu Feb 24 15:05:16 UTC 2005
On 24/02/05 11:20, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at impara.de> wrote:
> Am 24.02.2005 um 14:37 schrieb Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene:
>
>> On 24/02/05 09:55, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at impara.de> wrote:
>>
>>> Why, isSymbol of course. Symbols and MultiSymbols answer true, while
>>> all other objects answer false. Just look for implementors of isSymbol
>>> ...
>>>
>>> - Bert -
>> Bert
>>
>> Symbols isSymbol was gone.
>> Object isSymbol answer false
>> MultiSymbols isSymbol answer true
>> Symbols not inherits from MultiSymbol so answer false.
>>
>> And Code blows or enter in neverland
>>
>> I check before I ask , so answers remains.
>
> In both my Squeak 3.8g-6569 image and the Squeakland-3.8.5976-388
> image, the method Symbol>>isSymbol is there. I checked before
> answering, too. What image are you using?
>
> - Bert -
>
>
I catch the guilty in Symbol removeSelector: #isSymbol! in split code.
Image are fine (besides my complain about missing Flaps to first sight).
Sorry by troubles and very thanks for rapid help.
That¹s is what happen when you are invited to a Ferrari team and only know
bycicles repair. :=)
Cheers.
Edgar
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|