[Q] Why is the correct way to as for a Symbol un 3.8 ?

Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene edgardec2001 at yahoo.com.ar
Thu Feb 24 15:05:16 UTC 2005


On 24/02/05 11:20, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at impara.de> wrote:

> Am 24.02.2005 um 14:37 schrieb Lic. Edgar J. De Cleene:
> 
>> On 24/02/05 09:55, "Bert Freudenberg" <bert at impara.de> wrote:
>> 
>>> Why, isSymbol of course. Symbols and MultiSymbols answer true, while
>>> all other objects answer false. Just look for implementors of isSymbol
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> - Bert -
>> Bert
>> 
>> Symbols isSymbol was gone.
>> Object isSymbol  answer false
>> MultiSymbols isSymbol  answer true
>> Symbols not inherits from MultiSymbol so answer false.
>> 
>> And Code blows or enter in neverland
>> 
>> I check before I ask , so answers remains.
> 
> In both my Squeak 3.8g-6569 image and the Squeakland-3.8.5976-388
> image, the method Symbol>>isSymbol is there. I checked before
> answering, too. What image are you using?
> 
> - Bert -
> 
> 
I catch the guilty in Symbol removeSelector: #isSymbol! in split code.

Image are fine (besides my complain about missing Flaps to first sight).

Sorry by troubles and very thanks for rapid help.

That¹s is what happen when you are invited to a Ferrari team and only know
bycicles repair. :=)

Cheers.

Edgar





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list