read the traits papers (was "To Traits Or Not To Traits")

SmallSqueak smallsqueak at rogers.com
Thu Feb 24 22:29:19 UTC 2005


>
> Göran writes:
>
>  > then we take first look, and then probably solicit some feedback from
>  > stakeholders.
>
> Stéphane responds:
>
>  > Yes please do it, but read the %$%$#$%#X papers...
>
> Göran responds:
>
>  > Calm down Stephane - not all Squeakers have the time to read your
>  > papers. I will read them - at least some of them - but don't expect
>  > all of us to have the time to do that.
>
> This seems very odd to me. I just don't see the point of having this
> discussion without being informed. Reading the papers is work, yes, but
> it seems mandatory if one is to take the Traits work seriously (and less
> work than this email thread so far :). And how nice that there are
> papers to read! That's a pleasant luxury for us.
>
> Read the papers. :)  Diligence demands it.
>

    Nah, readers read ; leaders scribe ;-)


    Cheers,

    SmallSqueak


    P.S:

    And don't forget the "prophecy" that Squeak savior is a writer ;-)





More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list