Aspects (Was: Re: Stefs roadmap for 3.9, time to get it nailed down)

Cees de Groot cg at cdegroot.com
Sat Feb 26 15:57:13 UTC 2005


On Sat, 26 Feb 2005 02:00:14 -0800, Blake <blake at kingdomrpg.com> wrote:

> OK, enough cheerleading, I guess. I just haven't seen anything this  
> exciting in a while. (Maybe aspects, but while I get why aspects are  
> exciting, I have yet to really grasp how they work.)
>
Well, funny - we've had Aspect/S for years. Does anyone use it? Or are  
aspects just exciting but less-than-practical for real use?



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list