Hi!

Ned Konz <ned at squeakland.org> wrote:
> On Sunday 27 February 2005 6:42 am, Martin Kuball wrote:
> > 1. There is no buffered filestream in squeak. When reading multimedia
> > stuff you often have to examine each byte. So you do a lot of method
> > calls to get the next byte. That implies a primitive call each time.
> > Not very fast.
> 
> It's easy to make a buffered filestream, especially a read-only one.

Also, take a look at SharedStreams on SM. Very nice for these kind of
things.
 
regards, Göran