Stephane;

I will post it here.  It may take a couple of days, 
maybe this weekend.

Doug


--- stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:

> Please send it. May be publish it also on mantis.  I
> patched the global 
> method that contains the balloon for halo :( But you
> know what it is.  
> Again I do not know if people will be afraid that
> this is breaking 
> their code (It will break mine). So is your solution
> keeping (via 
> deprecation) the old way?
> 
> I think that the halospec code in Preference could
> be moved to 
> haloMorph without impacting the system. But this is
> looking like 
> another kind of changes.
> 
> So may be if you can send you code some Morphic/Etoy
> guy can have a 
> look even if
> I think that nobody will do it (but this is my
> pessimistic point of 
> view, of course I will look at it
> but I would like that people more concerned about
> less breaking stuff 
> do it, if you see what I mean).
> 
> Stef
> 
> 
> > Stephane;
> >
> > I have a small changeset where I have refactored
> the
> > halos.  In the old way, halos are nothing more
> than
> > EllipseMorphs, which rely on the Morphs to
> implement
> > functionality.  What I did was create halo
> classes,
> > and implement the functionality in them.  This
> allowed
> > me to move some methods out of Morph.  Then I
> > refactored the halospecs, so that each morph is
> > responsible for the halos specs, rather than
> spreading
> > the code out all over.  It also allows the halos
> to be
> > more instance specific, so a programmer to allow a
> n
> > instance of a morph to bring up different halos at
> > different times.
> 
> I need that :)
> 
> 
> >  If you'd like it, I can post it.
> >
> > Doug
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > --- stéphane ducasse <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> >
> >> hi
> >>
> >> I have been creating my own halos and I found
> quite
> >> strange that a lot
> >> of the code for halospec and haloMorph
> >> is located in Preferences and not on the class
> side
> >> of HaloMorph or
> >> HaloSpec.
> >> I could of course change that but are people
> >> concerned by that or
> >> prefer to keep a clunky system?
> >>
> >> Stef
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >
> >
> 
> 
>