On Jul 4, 2005, at 7:18 AM, Avi Bryant wrote:

> Yes, I agree.  The apache.org site is a good example here: there's  
> almost nothing on the top-level site, and everyone always links to  
> one of the (many) project sites.  One thing that makes this feel a  
> little more cohesive is that they are all something.apache.org.  I  
> don't know if that's a can of worms we want to open, but in theory  
> I can see having a very simple, general www.squeak.org with  
> tweak.squeak.org, wx.squeak.org, and so on below it serving  
> individual communities.
>

And then on the main squeak.org site, we do aggregation as new  
articles of the distributed sites. And don't forget SqueakLand and  
Croquet pointers as well. Kind of a SqueakDot site as the root. Lots  
of activity, but all of it distributed, because in truth, that's how  
we all operate anyway.

My 2 cents,

Brian