Squeak's "general acceptance"
Blake
blake at kingdomrpg.com
Thu Jul 7 04:04:36 UTC 2005
On Wed, 06 Jul 2005 19:39:06 -0700, Andrew Greenberg <werdna at mucow.com>
wrote:
> Let's recap this all too oft-repeated thread:
>
> 1. Squeak is not generally accepted.
> 2. Generally accepted platforms have feature X
> 3. Squeak should have feature X to become generally accepted.
X was the website. We then did (my fault, I guess):
4. Feature Y is more important than feature X for GA.
5a. You mean feature Y2*? 'cause we have that.
5b. So what?
5c. We have feature Y, or will have it in spades shortly.
I really didn't mean to be as, em, =thoroughly= discussed as it was--it
was a casual observation--but since I didn't know about Y2 (Seaside table
presentation) I'm glad it was.
===Blake===
* A hollow voice says "Plugh"
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|