LookEnhancements enhancement
John Pierce
john.raymond.pierce at gmail.com
Thu Jul 28 02:35:44 UTC 2005
Hi Adrian,
On 7/26/05, Adrian Lienhard <adi at netstyle.ch> wrote:
>
> Another thing that stroke me is peed... In 3.8 with the enhancement
> everything seems to be a bit slower than before (the UI in Squeak
> never was fast but I have the feeling it become slower with each new
> release...).
>
> To get some numbers (they should probably be treated with care..) I
> evaluated "[ 10 timesRepeat: [ Browser openBrowser ] ] timeToRun" and
> got:
>
> 3.7 without LookEnhancement: 9674
> 3.7 with LookEnhancement: 12060
> 3.8 with LookEnhancement: 15665
> 3.8 without LookEnhancement: 11138
>
I cannot seem to substantiate these findings. Here's what I get after
successive timed trials:
3.8 without LookEnhancements: 4 - 5 seconds
3.8 with LookEnhancements: 4 - 5 seconds
I saw no measurable difference in the timing, and, if any, the performance
was marginally better for some goofy reason. Honest! I am running a P4
1.7GHz with 1 GB ram. Anyways, I don't find any hot spots to improve
performance on at the moment.
Regards,
John
--
It's easy to have a complicated idea. It's very very hard to have a simple
idea. -- Carver Mead
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/attachments/20050727/05960b0b/attachment.htm
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|