[TEAM] A couple of process suggestions

Cees De Groot cdegroot at gmail.com
Fri Jun 10 11:20:40 UTC 2005


On 6/10/05, goran at krampe.se <goran at krampe.se> wrote:
> It varies. Some do, some possibly don't. If a team fails it isn't the
> end of the world though.
>
However, a team should fail early. No carrot-and-stick politics. So
maybe we should want to have something in place to declare a team a
failure, opening the possibility for a fresh restart.
 > We *have* thought about the Team model. I was perhaps the one who wrote
> it down and probably influenced it the most though. The idea was to
> follow the KISS principle and delegate as much as possibly to the Team
> leader and the team itself. I think that is the correct way to go.
>
The KISS principle in politics is, I think, called 'subsidiarity' -
everything gets to be decided at the lowest possible level (but not
lower). I think it is a very good principle.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list