about 3.9alpha
Alexandre Bergel
bergel at iam.unibe.ch
Fri Jun 17 12:27:57 UTC 2005
Hello Milan,
I do not know if someone changed the configuration of the stream, but I did an update from the Squeak Public Server using a 3.8-6548 and several changes got loaded without any error.
Cheers,
Alexandre
On Fri, Jun 10, 2005 at 02:11:11AM -0400, Milan Zimmermann wrote:
> Hi Stef,
>
> OK, sorry I misunderstood I thought you ment help testing the update from 3.8
> to 3.9 in your previous email.
>
> I have tried the update before I realized it, because I wanted to try latest
> 3.9alpha, so FWIW, here's what hapened
>
> I did:
> - download 3.8 Full from http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/3.8/
> - ran the 3.8 Full image under squeak version =
> 3.8a-1 #1 Tue Mar 22 14:09:10 PST 2005 ccache
> Squeak3.8gamma of '24 November 2004' [latest update: #6548]
> - Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered Yes Update ->
> Squeak Public Updates, 0 updates
> - executed in workspace: SystemVersion newVersion:'Squeak3.9alpha'
> - saved image as Squeak3.9alpha.image
> - restarted squeak with Squeak3.9alpha.image
> - Squeak asked "Do you want to check for updates" - answered Yes Update ->
> Squeak Public Updates. When loading:
> Error1: Loading 6537, Server Name Not Found and other errors, finally
> abandod.
> Restarted update, 9 more updates after tat, no more errors
> - saved
> - did a few very simple things with Projects, Morphs etc
> - simple stuff looks good
>
> Then I wanted to use it as webserver instead of 3.7 I use now, so I:
> - OPened SqueakMap PackageLoader
> - When Loading it: error occured when updating map:
> UndefinedObject>>allInstances. Proceeded, but keeps repeating, finally
> abandoned it
>
> So I was unable to open PackageLoader ... Perhaps a known problem anyway (I
> don't need to fix it in any way, just thought I'd report it as I've already
> kept the log)
>
> milan
>
> On June 9, 2005 04:34 pm, stéphane ducasse wrote:
> > Hi milan
> >
> > > Stef, Does it help to just test the upgrade from 3.8 final to
> > > 3.9alpha, and is
> > > it more valuable to test from full or basic or both?
> >
> > I think that for now we should really work more on putting in place
> > mechanisms to
> > support 3.9 (use of MC) so testing may be of limited use.
> > But if you do it please let us know if you get problems
> > Stef
> >
> > > There seem many places pointing to 3.7 as "latest", I assume a good
> > > link to
> > > 3.8 is
> > >
> > > http://box1.squeakfoundation.org/files/3.8/
> > >
> > > Thanks Milan
> > >
> > >> Stef
>
--
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.
More information about the Squeak-dev
mailing list
|