On 6/28/05, marcelo Cortez <jmdc_marcelo at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:
> Great!
> 
>   The new implementation has support for md5
> connections?
> The older one hasn´t

>From a quick look at the code, I think it doesn't, unfortunately.

Incidentally, although I'm all for portable code, the way the port to
Smalltalk/X was done makes the code much less pleasant to read - there
are what amount to #ifdef blocks for isSqueak and isSmalltalkX
littered throughout... if it's too hard to abstract these away, it
might not be a bad idea to port those fixes and unit tests back into
the earlier clean Squeak-only version, IMHO.

Avi