Hi!

Michael Rueger <michael at impara.de> wrote:
> goran.krampe at bluefish.se wrote:
> 
> > You may omit <host> implying "localhost" (thus getting 3 slashes in a
> > row), but that is it. The path is always absolute according to the
> > standard, but in Squeak you can still tell the URL if it should be
> 
> for the gazilionst time:
> relative URIs/URLs are allowed by the standard 
> (http://www.faqs.org/rfcs/rfc2396.html).

Eh, hmmm, this feels like deja vu. :) Ah, it is:

	http://lists.squeakfoundation.org/pipermail/squeak-dev/2004-April/07778
8.html
 
> They just have to be resolved against an absolute URI in order to access 
> the resource identified/located by it.
> 
> And the URLs in Squeak are still broken and should be replaced by one of 
> the existing standard compliant URI implementations.
> 
> OK, stepping of my soap box with the broken record sounding...

I still am confused at what to think. See the posting above. It does not
seem clear cut at all.

> Michael

regards, Göran