Is there a task forces identifying packages in Squeak?

Alexandre Bergel bergel at iam.unibe.ch
Tue Mar 15 17:27:25 UTC 2005


I am wondering if we really need a new mailing list packages-subscribe at discuss.squeakfoundation.org. Why not to use the one of modules instead ?

Alexandre


On Tue, Mar 15, 2005 at 12:07:39PM +0100, Avi Bryant wrote:
> On Tue, 15 Mar 2005 08:35:46 +0100, stéphane ducasse
> <ducasse at iam.unibe.ch> wrote:
> > hi guys
> > 
> > I thought that the packages group would start to initiate some actions
> > to identify (put the right * in category) or use the package browser so
> > that we could get loadble/unloadable packages in 3.9.
> > 
> > Did I dream or this discussion was in the air?
> 
> You weren't dreaming.  I recently mentioned on this list a page I put
> together to coordinate this effort:
> http://minnow.cc.gatech.edu/squeak/5641
> 
> So far, exactly one person has signed up on that page (thanks, Lex). 
> Stef, is there anyone at the SCG that can pitch in and help?
> 
> > My impression is that the effort of alex around the package browser
> > (integrating category and MC package) is really interesting and could
> > really support this effort transparently.
> 
> In the long run, it certainly will be.  Before it's useful for this
> kind of thing, though, it needs to have more support for extension
> methods.
> 
> Avi
> 

-- 
_,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:
Alexandre Bergel  http://www.iam.unibe.ch/~bergel
^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;._,.;:~^~:;.



More information about the Squeak-dev mailing list